First Thoughts on Google+, the Social Network

Google has revealed some information about its latest try to get into the social game and be a worthy competitor for Facebook. Even though Google is a much larger company with a lot more profit than Facebook, its main fear should be that all activity of users will take place behind the closed walls of Facebook. This way all this activity will not be visible to Google search users.

There’s a lot that can be said about Google and its efforts to set up social media services or features. From Orkut to Wave and Buzz the results have varied from mediocre to miserable failure. Now Google has presented Google+, a place where multiple social features come together. Some highlights:

  • Circles: smaller groups of people (family, friends, work, etc.) so you can just share information with this list.
  • Activity stream: which supposedly looks very much like Facebook
  • Sparks: Search the social activities
  • Instant Upload: have your photos on your Android or iPhone sent to Google+, ready to share with people
  • Hangout: video chatting for up to 10 people. Set up a chat and have other people drop in and watch Youtube videos

You can find more details on the Google+ website: http://www.google.com/+/ Wired has an excellent piece by Steven Levy who has walked around the + project for the past year an has more about the motivation of the project. The next quote is from this piece.

Vic Gundotra, Social VP of Google:“We’re transforming Google itself into a social destination at a level and scale that we’ve never attempted — orders of magnitude more investment, in terms of people, than any previous project.”

My thoughts

  • I have been waiting for a central hub for Google’s social tools. It’s nice that you try to bake in some social components in other services such as Gmail and Reader, but I think it is very confusing if you don’t have a central overview.
  • The circles are very smart. This is something Facebook really lacks. It makes it very easy to be in control of what you share and with whom. Big lesson learned from Buzz I think.
  • What is the connection with other social tools and Google services? Will the photo part integrate with Picasa? How does Buzz fit into this? Will they stop development of it or will it be incorporated (I say incorporate for people who want that). Hangout looks a lot like Gtalk, what’s the connection there? How will Reader Shared items and the +1 button work with Google+? It would be a real strong point if Google would use + to create some order in the chaos and have a clear social proposition for users.
  • Some services in + have a lot of potential to replace current success stories, especially with mobile integration (which is a big part in + I think). Send updates to people in a circle from your phone. Check in when you are visiting a location or ask your friends for recommendations (using the sparks). If Hangout works on your phone, no need to call regularly any more.

As always it’s now about execution and getting users. I have signed up to get a beta account so I’m very curious how this will continue. It looks like a more serious and better executed effort than the previous attempts and I expect it will get the support an effort it deserves.

Source: Wired Marketingfacts

Finding a Good Book Sharing App on Facebook

What’s the point of reading books (or accomplishing anything for that matter) if you can’t share it on Facebook? So I went looking for what the best Facebook app is to store the books that I have read and want to read to show to my friends. I did a quick search on Google (since the app search in Facebook is pretty useless. You can search for “books” but it lists 15 pages of apps unsorted) and I found the following apps to be most often mentioned: weRead, Visual Bookshelf and GoodReads.

After a short comparison I went with Goodreads. Honestly only based on the number of people using it. I could not really compare on functionality because all the aforementioned apps claim similar features: track what you have read, want to read and what your friends are reading. So I guess the most important criterion for a Facebook app is how many friends and other people are using it.

I have to be honest and tell you that I actually don’t have a clue how Goodread or the other apps are doing what they claim. As always I am totally confused by Facebook and its structure. This leaves me with many questions after “installing” (allowing the app to access all your personal data) Goodreads. Can only people who are also using Goodreads see my books? Will a message be posted when I have read a book? Will it show on my profile that I am reading a book? I was even confused when trying to find out more information about these apps, because sometimes you’re on the “Page” of a service and sometimes you’re on the “app page” (which even more confusing has a “go to app” button)

Perhaps I need a Facebook app that can explain how Facebook works?

A newer Friendfeed (and faster en better en prettier)

Friendfeed is a one stop shop for all of your social network and news needs. It exists for about two years now and is steadily growing. When Facebook launched their redesign a couple of weeks ago they had copied a large part of the interface of Friendfeed. Now Friendfeed has got a redesign of its own, which has launched today in beta mode on http://beta.friendfeed.com. After having received feedback from the users they will transfer this design to the main site.

As I said the site is your main hub for all of your online communication needs and this has only improved since today’s redesign. It’s very versatile (it can be used in many ways) and very powerful (you can add an extract a lot of information).

One way of using it is just like twitter, but then with many more possibilities of adding images, videos and links to your messages. So forget about twitpic, mobypicture, powertwitter and other services like URL shorteners and unshorteners, because you can all add it to Friendfeed. Another way of using Friendfeed is by having a great overview of all of your contacts online activity in one place like blogposts, flickr photos, vimeo videos and digg and youtube favorites for example. On the other side it’s a nice way to collect all your own things and display them in a nice centralized way.

But enough introduction. I’m just telling this because I am enthousiastic about it and think Friendfeed could easily replace twitter, facebook, myspace and other social networks. You just have to know how and take some time figuring out the site. To see the new design in action go to http://beta.friendfeed.com. You can find my profile on http://beta.friendfeed.com/tobiasverhoog.

The most interesting changes since today are:

  • All the pages are real-time now. (This can look imposing, but there is a pause button and with the right filters and lists this becomes very usable)
  • You can send contacts direct messages. These are regular posts, but the receiver gets a flag in their received messages list. This is what I was missing to have it replace twitter. I have to give it some more tryout time and of course my twitter contacts have to make the jump)
  • In the design the person from whom something comes is more emphasized than what source it came from.
  • There is a (modest) profile page.
  • Filtering and searching has changed and improved. This requires some more time to figure out and setup, but after a while you can perfectly tune the site to your needs.

There are all sorts of large and small changes, that above all have to make the communication and sharing with your contacts easier. It’s a bit more like a real-time chatroom. For more elaborate reviews go to Techcrunch, Scobleizer, Thomas Hawk and the Friendfeed blog itself. These blogs have already gotten a preview last friday. They had only forgotten to invite yours truly. It’s a disgrace…